Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
BIREV: Business and Investment Review Jurnal manajemen dan ekonomi terbaik
Articles
DOI: 10.61292/birev.188
Published: 2024-09-23

Urban Inequality in the Age of Smart Cities: A Bibliometric Review of Critical Urban Sociology (2014–2024)

Department of Sociology, Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu
Department of Sociology, Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu
Department of Sociology, Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu
Department of Management, Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu
urban inequality smart cities bibliometric analysis digital divide neoliberal urban governance socio-spatial disparities data justice algorithmic bias critical urban sociology sustainable urban development

Abstract

Urban inequality remains a pressing challenge in the 21st century, exacerbated by smart city technologies and neoliberal governance, which often deepen socio-spatial disparities despite their promises of efficiency and sustainability. While qualitative critiques of smart cities exist, few studies employ bibliometric methods to systematically analyze the intellectual structure of urban inequality research, particularly across geographical and institutional contexts. This study addresses this gap by mapping the evolution of critical urban sociology’s engagement with smart city inequality from 2014–2024, using bibliometric analysis of 460 key publications from Scopus and VOSviewer to identify dominant themes, gaps, and emerging debates through bibliographic coupling, co-citation, and keyword co-occurrence analyses. The findings reveal five major clusters, including data-driven governance, digital exclusion, and neoliberal urbanism, with seminal works by Sassen (2014) and Kitchin (2016) dominating the discourse, while also highlighting gaps such as limited Global South perspectives and feminist/postcolonial critiques. Temporal shifts show a growing focus on algorithmic bias and data justice, underscoring the need for inclusive, participatory smart city frameworks. The study concludes by advocating for equitable governance models, democratized technology access, and interdisciplinary approaches to mitigate urban inequality, offering a foundation for future research and policy interventions.

References

  1. Abella A., Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado M., De-Pablos-Heredero C., A Model for the Analysis of Data-Driven Innovation and Value Generation in Smart Cities’ Ecosystems, Cities, 64, pp. 47-53, (2017)
  2. Allam Z., Dhunny Z.A., On big data, artificial intelligence and smart cities, Cities, 89, pp. 80-91, (2019)
  3. Angelidou M., Smart cities: A conjuncture of four forces, Cities, 47, pp. 95-106, (2015)
  4. Albino V., Berardi U., Dangelico R.M., Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives, J. Urban Technol, 22, pp. 3-21, (2015)
  5. Allwinkle S., Cruickshank P., Creating Smart-er Cities: An Overview, J. Urban Technol, 18, pp. 1-16, (2011)
  6. Batty M., Axhausen K.W., Giannotti F., Pozdnoukhov A., Bazzani A., Wachowicz M., Ouzounis G., Portugali Y., Smart cities of the future, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top, 214, pp. 481-518, (2012)
  7. Angelidou M., Smart city policies: A spatial approach, Cities, 41, pp. S3-S11, (2014)
  8. Bibri S.E., Krogstie J., Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review, Sustain. Cities Soc, 31, pp. 183-212, (2017)
  9. Cui L., Xie G., Qu Y., Gao L., Yang Y., Security and privacy in smart cities: Challenges and opportunities, Ieee Access, 6, pp. 46134-46145, (2018)
  10. Ahad M.A., Paiva S., Tripathi G., Feroz N., Enabling technologies and sustainable smart cities, Sustain. Cities Soc, 61, (2020)
  11. Ahvenniemi H., Huovila A., Pinto-Seppa I., Airaksinen M., What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities?, Cities, 60, pp. 234-245, (2017)
  12. Bhushan B., Khamparia A., Sagayam K.M., Sharma S.K., Ahad M.A., Debnath N.C., Blockchain for Smart Cities: A Review of Architectures, Integration Trends and Future Research Directions, Sustain. Cities Soc, 61, (2020)
  13. Anthopoulos L., Smart utopia VS smart reality: Learning by experience from 10 smart city cases, Cities, 63, pp. 128-148, (2017)
  14. Bakici T., Almirall E., Wareham J., A smart city initiative: The case of Barcelona, J. Knowl. Econ, 4, pp. 135-148, (2013)
  15. Bibri S.E., Krogstie J., Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review, Sustain. Cities Soc, 31, pp. 183-212, (2017)
  16. Cardullo, P., & Kitchin, R. (2019). Smart urbanism and smart citizenship: The neoliberal logic of ‘citizen-focused’ smart cities in Europe. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 37(5), 813–830. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654418781087
  17. Datta, A. (2015). New urban utopias of postcolonial India: ‘Entrepreneurial urbanization’ in Dholera smart city, Gujarat. Dialogues in Human Geography, 5(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820614565748
  18. Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. Routledge.
  19. Sadowski, J. (2020). Too smart: How digital capitalism is extracting data, controlling our lives, and taking over the world. MIT Press.
  20. Sassen, S. (2014). Expulsions: Brutality and complexity in the global economy. Harvard University Press.
  21. Datta, A. (2018). The digital turn in postcolonial urbanism: Smart citizenship in the making of India’s 100 smart cities. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 43(3), 405–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12225
  22. Kitchin, R. (2016). The ethics of smart cities and urban science. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 374(2083), 20160115. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0115
  23. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  24. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629

How to Cite

Yusuf, S. G., Ledyawati, Wijayanti, A., & Pakpahan, F. N. (2024). Urban Inequality in the Age of Smart Cities: A Bibliometric Review of Critical Urban Sociology (2014–2024) . Business and Investment Review, 2(5). https://doi.org/10.61292/birev.188